First time here? Get a 15% off on your first group session with Dr. Juman with code JA15
Insulin Resistance: a Vicious Cycle

Insulin Resistance: a Vicious Cycle

by Andrea Chahoud in News

Insulin resistance is a condition that can have detrimental effects on our health, including the development of diabetes, fatty liver, and obesity. Identifying the role of insulin in glucose regulation and fat metabolism is crucial to understand insulin resistance.

Role of Insulin in the Body

Insulin is crucial in regulating our bodies’ glucose and fat metabolism. When we consume carbohydrates, they are broken down into glucose, the primary energy source for our cells. Here’s how insulin helps in regulating glucose and fat:

Glucose Regulation: When blood sugar levels rise after a meal, the pancreas releases insulin into the bloodstream. Insulin is like a key that unlocks the cells, allowing glucose to enter and be used for energy production. It also signals the liver to store excess glucose as glycogen, which can be later released when energy is needed. Insulin helps lower blood sugar levels by facilitating glucose uptake into cells, preventing them from reaching dangerous levels.

Fat Regulation: Insulin also plays a role in fat metabolism. When insulin is present in the bloodstream, it inhibits the breakdown of fat stores and promotes the uptake of fatty acids into adipose (fat) tissue. It stimulates the production of lipoprotein lipase, an enzyme that helps store fat by converting it into triglycerides within fat cells. Additionally, insulin inhibits the release of stored fat from adipose tissue, preventing the breakdown of triglycerides for energy. This means that when insulin levels are high, the body favors fat storage rather than fat utilization.

Insulin acts as an energy storage hormone, orchestrating the uptake and utilization of glucose by various organs and tissues in the body. It stimulates the liver and muscles to take in glucose from the blood and convert it into glycogen, a temporary storage form of energy. Additionally, insulin promotes the conversion of excess glucose into triglycerides, which are stored in fat cells (adipose tissue) as a long-term energy reserve.

What is Insulin Resistance?

Insulin resistance is a condition when our cells become less responsive to insulin signals. The body’s cells, particularly those in the liver, muscles, and fat tissue become less responsive to the effects of insulin. As a result, these organs cannot effectively take in glucose from the bloodstream, leading to elevated blood sugar levels (hyperglycemia). The pancreas responds by secreting more insulin to overcome this resistance and restore blood sugar levels. In other words, our bodies need to produce more insulin to get the same effect, leading to higher insulin levels in the bloodstream. Unfortunately, one of the effects of elevated insulin levels is increased fat storage. When insulin is high, our bodies prioritize storing excess energy as fat instead of using it for immediate energy needs. This can contribute to weight gain and make it harder to lose weight. In addition, insulin resistance can lead to higher blood sugar levels, which may increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. The persistently high insulin levels can contribute to the development of other health issues, such as fatty liver disease.

Causes of Insulin Resistance

Understanding the intricate mechanisms behind insulin resistance has been an ongoing challenge for researchers. While the exact cause of insulin resistance remains elusive, the most contributing factor is inflammation in adipose tissue. There exists lots of hypotheses of why inflammation occurs in the adipose tissue: quality of the diet, excessive weight gain and the role of the microbiome (the microorganisms residing in our gut). One study in mice has shown that inflammation in adipose tissue can be observed early on after the initiation of a high-fat diet and persist as long as the diet is maintained. When mice are switched back to a normal, healthier diet, the inflammation in their adipose tissue is rapidly reduced, indicating the dynamic nature of this process. This suggests a direct relationship between dietary choices and the inflammatory response within fat cells. Another intriguing hypothesis is that the rapid expansion of adipocytes, or fat cells, may be at the root of the inflammation observed. The rapid growth of the fat cells may outpace the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the expanding fat cells, resulting in a state of inadequate oxygenation known as hypoxia. This hypoxic environment may trigger a cascade of events that ultimately lead to inflammation within the adipose tissue. Finally, the composition of the gut microbiome can be altered by a high-fat diet, which in turn may contribute to the inflammatory response within fat cells. The interplay between the gut microbiome, dietary choices, and adipose tissue inflammation is an area of active research, and scientists are working to uncover the intricate connections between these factors.

Conclusion

Insulin resistance is a complex condition that disrupts the normal functioning of insulin in the body. Individuals with insulin resistance may require more insulin to process the same amount of food compared to those without insulin resistance. This excessive insulin secretion can further contribute to weight gain and the accumulation of body fat, exacerbating the challenges associated with managing insulin resistance.

While inflammation in adipose tissue appears to be a major culprit in the development of insulin resistance, the precise mechanisms underlying this process are still not fully understood. Researchers are actively conducting studies to unravel the intricate connections between inflammation, adipose tissue, and insulin resistance. Insulin resistance and inflammation create a vicious cycle. As fat accumulates in the body, it contributes to the development of insulin resistance. At the same time, insulin resistance promotes further weight gain, creating a self-perpetuating cycle. This cycle underscores the importance of addressing both factors in the management and prevention of obesity.

Previous Post Next Post

Related Posts

Why Having ‘Healthy Obesity’ Is Still Dangerous for Your Health?

Why Having ‘Healthy Obesity’ Is Still Dangerous for Your Health?

Introduction Obesity has long been linked to shorter lifespans, lower quality of life, and increased risk of disabilities due to cardiovascular diseases like diabetes and atherosclerosis. This raised the question: how can some individuals with obesity appear healthy over the long term, whereas others show immediate signs of health problems? The concept of metabolically healthy obesity has caused quite a stir in the medical community and beyond in recent years, as it challenges deeply held beliefs and long-standing understandings. But the recognition of this phenomenon is far from a new discovery! It dates to Jean Vague’s observations in the 1950s that certain individuals with obesity had different predispositions towards diabetes and atherosclerosis, which seemed to be related to where their fat was concentrated on their bodies. What is the definition of metabolically healthy obesity? While individuals who have metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) have been extensively researched, a consensus on a definition in adults has only recently been reached. Metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) is defined as a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or higher and no concurrent metabolic disorder or cardiovascular diseases, such as type 2 diabetes or atherosclerotic disease. A more recent definition has been proposed, requiring additional criteria such as serum triglycerides ≤150 mg/dl and HDL-cholesterol serum concentrations higher than 40 mg/dl in men or 50 mg/dl in women. Do people with “healthy obesity” people exist? Recent studies show that MHO is found in 35% of the world’s population. However, there were notable differences between regions and various parts of the world. Irrespective of the definitions used and the remarkable regional and gender variation, MHO is not a rare condition. Long-term studies have suggested that MHO might be a transient state. About 30% of people with MHO develop or convert to a metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUHO) state with cardio-metabolic complications over a 5-10-year period. Aging and additional weight gain are risk factors for this conversion. Fortunately, increasing physical activity and losing weight can increase the likelihood of preserving MHO status. What are the health risks of “healthy obesity”? Metabolically healthy obesity is an interesting and complex phenomenon – on the one hand, these individuals are typically free of metabolic signs associated with “unhealthy weight”, yet they still have higher cardiovascular risks than those who maintain a normal weight.  However, their cardiovascular risks are lower than those of people with metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUHO). A 2019 study, for example, found that those with metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUHO) are 5-20 times more likely to develop diabetes than those with a ‘metabolically healthy normal weight’. Even for those with metabolically healthy obesity (MHO), there is still a 4-fold increased risk of developing diabetes compared to metabolically healthy normal weight. Similarly, the risk of cardiovascular diseases is 50% greater in people with MHO at baseline than in people who are metabolically healthy at a normal weight.  This means that while there are still risks involved with being classified as metabolically healthy obese, they are nowhere near as severe as those associated with those who are metabolically unhealthy. How to prevent the transition to metabolically unhealthy obesity? As MHO is not a static condition, attention has now shifted to what factors may predict metabolic deterioration from MHO to MUHO. A study in Spain identified three main factors: an increase in BMI, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio. On the flip side, lifestyle choices like following a healthy diet, regular exercise, and avoiding or quitting smoking prevented the transition to MUO. It’s clear from this that good habits can help maintain our health and protect us from potentially serious conditions like MUO. Conclusion There is such a thing as metabolically healthy obesity, but it may be transient and comes with its own risks. The best way to avoid these risks is to maintain a healthy weight through diet and exercise. So, let’s take care of our health and be more mindful of what we eat and how much we exercise. References Blüher, M. (2020). Metabolically Healthy Obesity. Endocrine Reviews, 41(3), 405.‏ Smith GI, Mittendorfer B, and Klein S. 2019. Metabolically healthy obesity: facts and fantasies. The Journal of clinical investigation 129:3978-3989. Post navigation

Learn more
Homeostatic and Hedonic Hunger

Homeostatic and Hedonic Hunger

Have you ever wondered why you can’t stop eating, even when you’re full? Or why do you eat more than your body needs? Have you ever felt like starving even after eating a big meal? Or found yourself craving food, even if it wasn’t remotely close to mealtime? If so, what you experienced is called hedonic hunger. It turns out that what we think of as “hunger” is two different things. In modern times, among well-nourished populations, an increasing proportion of human food consumption appears to be driven by pleasure, not the need for calories —which isn’t necessarily bad! In this article, we’ll look at homeostatic and hedonic hunger to better understand the motivations behind food consumption. History of Human Food Consumption For most of human history and prehistory, the primary objective of seeking food was survival through maintaining energy homeostasis and avoiding starvation. Humans had to eat enough food that provided enough calories to meet their daily needs. It was essential for early humans to have enough energy to perform physical tasks such as gathering food and other resources or defending themselves from predators. In modern times, energy homeostasis is no longer an issue for most people living in developed countries who no longer need to worry about finding food for existence. The availability of an abundance of tasty foods has changed our relationship with eating from one primarily focused on survival to one also driven by pleasure. Hemeostatic vs. Hedonic Hunger Homeostatic hunger is what most people think of when they hear the word “hunger.” It refers to the body’s need for energy to maintain balance (homeostasis). When your body needs energy, it sends signals to your brain telling you to eat. Physiological needs drive this type of hunger. Hedonic hunger, however, is driven by pleasure and anticipation of reward rather than physiological needs. Hedonic hunger is an intense, psychological desire for food triggered by external cues such as the sight or smell of food, social events, time, or advertising campaigns. Unlike homeostatic hunger, which is generally limited to only what our bodies need in terms of calories, hedonic hunger is not constrained by physical limitations and can often result in over-consumption. The interplay between these two types of hunger has become increasingly complex in recent years due to the availability of calorie-dense foods with high levels of added sugar and fat. These foods are designed for maximum pleasure, making them difficult for many people to resist even if their body does not need them.   How do We Know We are Hungry? Hunger is challenging to specify. We need help not only quantifying our hunger, but many need help identifying whether we are hungry at all. There may be no solid characteristic pattern of hunger symptoms when it comes to typical hunger sensations. When participants were asked about hunger sensations, there were three key identifiers. First and foremost, most people experience a growling stomach as an indicator that it’s time for food. Secondly, many people also report feeling an empty sensation in their stomach when they are hungry. Lastly, some people describe feeling mild to moderate stomach pain when hungry. In addition to these typical hunger sensations, many people experience extreme hunger sensations: headaches, lightheadedness, or dizziness, being fixated on food and feeling irritable or cranky. Understanding the distinction between homeostatic and hedonic hunger is essential for physical and mental health since it can help us make better food choices. There are distinct neural pathways associated with homeostatic and hedonic motivation for eating with animal models;  however, further research should be conducted to understand how these systems interact within humans. It is sometimes hard to recognize the type of hunger in real life. However, hedonic hunger involves two constructs: liking and wanting. Liking vs. Wanting Food The primary difference between liking and wanting food lies in the motivation behind eating. Liking is a pleasure derived from oro-sensory stimulation of food – think flavors, textures, smells, etc. Conversely, wanting is defined as incentive salience or the motivation to engage in eating. When you want something, you are more likely to seek it out despite any associated costs or calories involved. By understanding these two different types of motivation when it comes to eating, we can begin to make better decisions about our diets and health goals. For example, if you “like” a specific type of food but do not necessarily need it (i.e., don’t have an urgent “want”), then it may be best to practice moderation rather than overindulge in something your body doesn’t need. On the other hand, if you want a particular type of snack despite having already eaten earlier in the day (or week!), then perhaps it’s time to take a step back and ask yourself why – are you bored? Stressed? Anxious? Identifying those underlying motivations for wanting specific foods can help us develop healthier habits and make more informed decisions about what we eat. Conclusion Enhanced hedonic response to foods can augment hunger even when satiated, meaning that even if we don’t feel hungry, we may still be tempted by tasty treats. Identifying between homeostatic and hedonic hunger can be challenging but ultimately rewarding. You will have more control over your eating habits if you understand where those cravings come from! By paying attention to cues from your body, keeping track of meals/snacks throughout the day, and taking breaks whenever necessary, you’ll be able to tell which type of hunger is driving your appetite–and make healthier choices accordingly! All this shows just how complex our relationship with food can be. References Lowe, M.R. and Butryn, M.L., 2007. Hedonic hunger: a new dimension of appetite?. Physiology & behavior, 91(4), pp.432-439. Blundell, J.E. and Finlayson, G., 2004. Is susceptibility to weight gain characterized by homeostatic or hedonic risk factors for overconsumption?. Physiology & behavior, 82(1), pp.21-25.

Learn more
Evidence on Intermittent Fasting: Reality Check

Evidence on Intermittent Fasting: Reality Check

Intermittent fasting (IF) is a dietary approach involving fasting and eating periods. Unlike traditional diets that focus on what you eat, IF focuses on when you eat. The idea behind intermittent fasting is to restrict calorie intake during specific periods of the day or week while allowing for unrestricted eating during other periods. There are several types of intermittent fasting, including periodic fasting, alternate-day fasting, and time-restricted eating. Types of Intermittent Fasting Periodic fasting, also known as periodic calorie restriction, is a type of intermittent fasting that involves fasting for one or more days a week. For example, you might fast for two days a week and eat normally for the other five days. Alternate-day fasting is a type of intermittent fasting that involves fasting every other day. On fasting days, you restrict your calorie intake to 500-600 calories; on non-fasting days, you eat normally. This type of fasting is more challenging than periodic fasting because it involves fasting every other day. Time-restricted eating is intermittent fasting that restricts your eating window to a certain number of hours daily. For example, you might fast for 16 hours and eat within an eight-hour window. This approach is easier to implement than periodic fasting or alternate-day fasting because you don’t have to go without food for extended periods. Effectiveness of Intermittent Fasting Despite the increasing popularity of IF, the evidence regarding its effectiveness in promoting weight loss is conflicting. I will review the evidence from various meta-analyses. Meta-analysis is an invaluable tool to draw high-level conclusions from multiple studies centered on the same topic or research question. It is a powerful tool for providing a more accurate view of a subject or treatment. It allows researchers to combine data from multiple studies, eliminating the risk of any one study skewing the results. A review of the various meta-analyses (umbrella of meta-analyses) has found at least 28 associations between IF on BMI, body weight, fat mass, LDL-C (bad cholesterol) total cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR (a marker of insulin resistance), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mostly in adults with overweight or obesity. However, most of those associations were of very low to low evidence. Only one association was supported by high-quality evidence, the effect of modified alternate-day fasting for 1-2 months on weight loss and fatty liver compared to a regular diet.  IF was most successful for weight loss in the initial 1 to 6 months, followed by a plateau. A recent meta-analysis found that IF diets were not associated with a significantly different body weight at different durations ranging from 2-4 months, 6-8 months, 10-14 months, and 18-30 months compared to calorie-restricted diets. The effectiveness of IF in promoting weight loss and improving overall health is still under debate. Fasting or Calories Restriction As IF involves periods of fasting, this naturally leads to a reduction in calorie intake. Whether the effects of intermittent fasting (IF) on weight loss and health benefits are primarily due to the fasting process or the calorie restriction involved is a subject of ongoing debate and research. Although intermittent fasting may have unique metabolic and hormonal effects that go beyond simple calorie reduction based on timing (morning vs evening fasting) and pattern of fasting (alternate day vs. time restricted). However, those changes were not translated into better health outcomes or weight loss. Further research is needed to unravel the underlying mechanisms and determine the specific contributions of each factor. Some individuals may find it easier to adhere to an IF eating pattern and experience positive outcomes, while others may struggle with the restricted eating window given the social implications of eating time and symptoms of fatigue and headache during the fasting periods. Individuals should be mindful of their eating patterns during the normal eating periods. One can still consume excessive calories within the eating window, defeating IF’s purpose.  Finding a balanced and sustainable approach to weight loss that aligns with one’s lifestyle and preferences is crucial for successful weight management and overall health. References Patikorn C, Roubal K, Veettil SK, et al. Intermittent Fasting and Obesity-Related Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(12):e2139558. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39558 Harris, Leanne1; Hamilton, Sharon2,3; Azevedo, Liane B.2,3; Olajide, Joan2,3; De Brún, Caroline2,3; Waller, Gillian2,3; Whittaker, Vicki2,3; Sharp, Tracey4; Lean, Mike1; Hankey, Catherine1,∗; Ells, Louisa1,3,∗. Intermittent fasting interventions for treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports 16(2):p 507-547, February 2018. | DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003248 Gu L, Fu R, Hong J, Ni H, Yu K, Lou H. Effects of Intermittent Fasting in Human Compared to a Non-intervention Diet and Caloric Restriction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Nutr. 2022 May 2;9:871682. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.871682. PMID: 35586738; PMCID: PMC9108547. Elortegui Pascual, P., Rolands, M.R., Eldridge, A.L., Kassis, A., Mainardi, F., Lê, K.A., Karagounis, L.G., Gut, P. and Varady, K.A., 2023. A meta‐analysis comparing the effectiveness of alternate day fasting, the 5: 2 diet, and time‐restricted eating for weight loss. Obesity, 31, pp.9-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23568

Learn more
Home Search Cart Products About